Prof. Paul N Edwards, Stanford University, Program in Science, Technology & Society, Director says about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos

Prof. Paul N Edwards, Stanford University, Program in Science, Technology & Society, Director says about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos

Dear Colleagues

I write about the science, technology, and politics of knowledge and information infrastructures, with a specific focus on climate science and climate change. I'm also interested in critical data studies, algorithmic culture, and information science.

Read my article about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos here:

 https://www.academia.edu/19598608/Open_Access_Publishing_Commerce_and_the_Scientific_Ethos_Report_to_the_Swiss_Science_and_Innovation_Council?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption. Corrupted Publishers.

The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption The Stanford Iran 2040 Project is an academic initiative that serves as a hub for researchers all around the world—particularly scholars of the Iranian diaspora—to conduct research on economic and technical matters related to the long-term development of Iran and to evaluate their possible implications in a global context. The project encourages quantitative and forward-looking research on a broad array of areas relating to Iran's economic development. It seeks to envision the future of the country under plausible scenarios. The project has been co-sponsored by the Hamid and Christina Moghadam Program in Iranian Studies and the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford. Stanford Iran 2040 Project Encina Hall West, Room 206 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 www.iranian-studies.stanford.edu/iran2040 Download this very interesting study from here https://iranian-studies.stanford.edu/sites/g...
Read more

Unethical Attacks to Open Access Publishing by Librarians: The Jeffrey Beall’s case.

Unethical Attacks to Open Access Publishing by Librarians: The Jeffrey Beall’s case. Mario E. Alonso, Francisco Pedro M. Lopez Abstract —In this paper we examine the phenomenon of several attempts to destroy the Open Access Publishing from various librarians. The was against Open Access (OA) publishing started with the librarian Jeffrey Beall who is a librarian at Auraria Library at the University of Colorado, Denver, USA. However, after some years the common sense among the scholars is that Jeffrey Beall does not have the necessary qualifications to evaluate the various publishers and journals as well as several voices exist that claim that Jeffrey Beall is permanently bribed. Several librarians consider Open Access publishers to be a threat to their profession because there is less need for a library or librarian if academic journals are available free on the Internet. At one point, this so-called “Beall’s List” blog even stated that publishers would be removed from the list if t...
Read more

Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists. Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed

Professor  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists.  Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed http://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/3946/4658 See more  http://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/3946/4658 Beall “predatory open access” blog: rise and fall Other Section Mr. Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, with an MA in English and Spanish, but no PhD, became famous because of his blog,  www.scholarlyoa.com . Beall’s blog thus became synonymous with Beall, and Beall with his blog, and both are used interchangeably in this paper. Thus, praise or criticisms that one regularly reads in social media or blogs that refer to one, in general refer to both. Beall was the sole author—save for a few “guest” posts—of the entire blog content, and must thus be held accountable for everything that he published, just as equally as academics who publish are always accoun...
Read more