Prof. Paul N Edwards, Stanford University, Program in Science, Technology & Society, Director says about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos

Prof. Paul N Edwards, Stanford University, Program in Science, Technology & Society, Director says about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos

Dear Colleagues

I write about the science, technology, and politics of knowledge and information infrastructures, with a specific focus on climate science and climate change. I'm also interested in critical data studies, algorithmic culture, and information science.

Read my article about Open Access Publishing Commerce and the Scientific Ethos here:

 https://www.academia.edu/19598608/Open_Access_Publishing_Commerce_and_the_Scientific_Ethos_Report_to_the_Swiss_Science_and_Innovation_Council?auto=download&email_work_card=download-paper

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists. Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed

Professor  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists.  Reliance on Beall’s lists is flawed http://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/3946/4658 See more  http://amj.amegroups.com/article/view/3946/4658 Beall “predatory open access” blog: rise and fall Other Section Mr. Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the Auraria Library, University of Colorado Denver, with an MA in English and Spanish, but no PhD, became famous because of his blog,  www.scholarlyoa.com . Beall’s blog thus became synonymous with Beall, and Beall with his blog, and both are used interchangeably in this paper. Thus, praise or criticisms that one regularly reads in social media or blogs that refer to one, in general refer to both. Beall was the sole author—save for a few “guest” posts—of the entire blog content, and must thus be held accountable for everything that he published, just as equally as academics who publish are always accoun...
Read more

MDPI: A huge Predatory Publisher. It is clear MDPI is a predatory publisher and its journal Sustainability is a clear example of it.

It is clear that MDPI is a predatory publisher and its journal Sustainability is a clear example of it. See, for example, Sustainabilty scheduled for 2019 more than 680 special issues (plus 12 regular issues). More Details: http://widgren.blogspot.com/2019/02/is-mdpi-serious-publisher-or-predatory.html I was asked to review some articles for the MDPI journal, Diagnostics, about 2 years ago. The review process went smoothly and I was impressed at the speed the journal took from submission, to Editor consideration to send out for review, review by 2 or 3 reviewers, the response of the authors and subsequent re-review process to decision. The whole process time was about one month. Later, they contacted me to join the Diagnostics Editorial Board - that was in January 2019. Since then, I have been contacted about once or twice every 3 months to assess whether an article should go out for review. The Publishers never sent articles for review if I had indicated that they should not go...
Read more

David Publisher: The most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found http://www.davidpublisher.com/

David Publisher:  The most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found  http://www.davidpublisher.com/ We sent to them a fake article from copy-paste of some newspaper and we received LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE after 6 days We believe that David Publisher is the most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found   See also http://ethandoylewhite.blogspot.com/2013/11/theres-new-scam-targeting-academics-and.html
Read more