The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption. Corrupted Publishers.

The Scientific Output of Iran: Quantity, Quality, and Corruption

The Stanford Iran 2040 Project is an academic initiative that serves as a hub for researchers all around the world—particularly scholars of the Iranian diaspora—to conduct research on economic and technical matters related to the long-term development of Iran and to evaluate their possible implications in a global context. The project encourages quantitative and forward-looking research on a broad array of areas relating to Iran's economic development. It seeks to envision the future of the country under plausible scenarios. The project has been co-sponsored by the Hamid and Christina Moghadam Program in Iranian Studies and the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford. Stanford Iran 2040 Project Encina Hall West, Room 206 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 www.iranian-studies.stanford.edu/iran2040


Download this very interesting study from here

https://iranian-studies.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj6191/f/publications/the_scientific_output_of_iran.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MDPI: A huge Predatory Publisher. It is clear MDPI is a predatory publisher and its journal Sustainability is a clear example of it.

It is clear that MDPI is a predatory publisher and its journal Sustainability is a clear example of it. See, for example, Sustainabilty scheduled for 2019 more than 680 special issues (plus 12 regular issues). More Details: http://widgren.blogspot.com/2019/02/is-mdpi-serious-publisher-or-predatory.html I was asked to review some articles for the MDPI journal, Diagnostics, about 2 years ago. The review process went smoothly and I was impressed at the speed the journal took from submission, to Editor consideration to send out for review, review by 2 or 3 reviewers, the response of the authors and subsequent re-review process to decision. The whole process time was about one month. Later, they contacted me to join the Diagnostics Editorial Board - that was in January 2019. Since then, I have been contacted about once or twice every 3 months to assess whether an article should go out for review. The Publishers never sent articles for review if I had indicated that they should not go...
Read more

David Publisher: The most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found http://www.davidpublisher.com/

David Publisher:  The most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found  http://www.davidpublisher.com/ We sent to them a fake article from copy-paste of some newspaper and we received LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE after 6 days We believe that David Publisher is the most fake and predatory publisher that we have ever found   See also http://ethandoylewhite.blogspot.com/2013/11/theres-new-scam-targeting-academics-and.html
Read more

Unethical Attacks to Open Access Publishing by Librarians: The Jeffrey Beall’s case.

Unethical Attacks to Open Access Publishing by Librarians: The Jeffrey Beall’s case. Mario E. Alonso, Francisco Pedro M. Lopez Abstract —In this paper we examine the phenomenon of several attempts to destroy the Open Access Publishing from various librarians. The was against Open Access (OA) publishing started with the librarian Jeffrey Beall who is a librarian at Auraria Library at the University of Colorado, Denver, USA. However, after some years the common sense among the scholars is that Jeffrey Beall does not have the necessary qualifications to evaluate the various publishers and journals as well as several voices exist that claim that Jeffrey Beall is permanently bribed. Several librarians consider Open Access publishers to be a threat to their profession because there is less need for a library or librarian if academic journals are available free on the Internet. At one point, this so-called “Beall’s List” blog even stated that publishers would be removed from the list if t...
Read more